رَوَى فَضَالَةُ عَنْ أَبَانٍ عَنْ رَجُلٍ عَنْ أَبِي عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ع قَالَ سَأَلْتُهُ كَيْفَ يَكُونُ الرَّهْنُ بِمَا فِيهِ إِنْ كَانَ حَيَوَاناً أَوْ دَابَّةً أَوْ فِضَّةً أَوْ مَتَاعاً فَأَصَابَهُ حَرِيقٌ أَوْ لُصُوصٌ فَهَلَكَ مَالُهُ أَوْ نَقَصَ مَتَاعُهُ وَ لَيْسَ لَهُ عَلَى مُصِيبَتِهِ بَيِّنَةٌ قَالَ
Show clickable narrator chain
إِذَا ذَهَبَ مَتَاعُهُ كُلُّهُ فَلَمْ يُوجَدْ لَهُ شَيْءٌ فَلَا شَيْءَ عَلَيْهِ قَالَ وَ إِنْ قَالَ ذَهَبَ مِنْ بَيْنِ مَالِي وَ لَهُ مَالٌ فَلَا يُصَدَّقُ.
Read English translationHide English translationBab Ul Qaim Publications — attributed by Thaqalayn
Hadith.4112 - Fadalah narrated from Aban, who narrated from a man, that Abu Abdillah (as) was asked: "How does the collateral (rahn) remain valid in cases where it is an animal, a mount, silver, or goods, and it gets destroyed due to fire or theft, causing the owner's loss or a decrease in its value, and there is no evidence to support the claim of loss?" Imam (as) said: "If all of his goods are completely destroyed and nothing remains, then there is nothing (no liability) upon him." Imam (as) further said: "However, if he claims that the loss occurred from among his possessions while he still possesses other property, he will not be believed."
Translation: Bab Ul Qaim Publications — attributed by Thaqalayn·The Arabic above is the original.
الهوامش · 2⌄
[1]أي كيف يكون حكم الرهن ممّا وقع فيه من المذكورات.ص 311
[2]أي لا يصدق الا بالبينة على وقوع ذلك و مع ثبوت الوقوع لا شيء عليه.ص 311