رَوَى صَفْوَانُ بْنُ يَحْيَى عَنْ إِسْحَاقَ بْنِ عَمَّارٍ قَالَ سَأَلْتُ
Show clickable narrator chain
أَبَا إِبْرَاهِيمَ ع عَنِ الرَّجُلِ يَرْهَنُ الرَّهْنَ بِمِائَةِ دِرْهَمٍ وَ هُوَ يُسَاوِي ثَلَاثَمِائَةِ دِرْهَمٍ فَيُهْلِكُهُ أَ عَلَى الرَّجُلِ أَنْ يَرُدَّ عَلَى صَاحِبِهِ مِائَتَيْ دِرْهَمٍ قَالَ نَعَمْ لِأَنَّهُ أَخَذَ رَهْناً فِيهِ فَضْلٌ وَ ضَيَّعَهُ قُلْتُ فَهَلَكَ نِصْفُ الرَّهْنِ قَالَ عَلَى حِسَابِ ذَلِكَ قُلْتُ فَيَتَرَادَّانِ الْفَضْلَ قَالَ نَعَمْ.
Read English translationHide English translationBab Ul Qaim Publications — attributed by Thaqalayn
Hadith.4114 - Safwan ibn Yahya narrated from Ishaq ibn Ammar, who said: I asked Abu Ibrahim (Imam Musa ibn Jafar Al-Kadhim (as)) about a man who takes an item as collateral (rahn) for one hundred dirhams, while its value is three hundred dirhams, and it gets destroyed. Is the man required to return two hundred dirhams to its owner? Imam (as) said: "Yes, because he took collateral that had surplus value and then caused its loss." I asked: What if half of the collateral is destroyed? Imam (as) said: "It will be accounted for accordingly." I asked: Should they return the surplus value between them? Imam (as) said: "Yes."
Translation: Bab Ul Qaim Publications — attributed by Thaqalayn·The Arabic above is the original.
الهوامش · 1⌄
[5]محمول على ما إذا كان الهلاك بسبب المرتهن كما هو ظاهر قوله عليه السلام« و ضيعه». و الخبر رواه الكليني ج 5 ص 234 في الموثق.ص 311