Usul16

Hadith record

faqih-4930

من لا يحضره الفقيه

Book of Divorce (talaq)/Chapter on Recognizing the Major Sins for Which Allah {swt}, the Almighty, Has Threatened with Hellfire#7

No. ٤٩٣٧chapter #7vol. 3 · page 567
faqih-4930
سَأَلَ هِشَامُ بْنُ الْحَكَمِ أَبَا عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ع‌ عَنْ عِلَّةِ تَحْرِيمِ الرِّبَا فَقَالَ
Show clickable narrator chain

إِنَّهُ لَوْ كَانَ الرِّبَا حَلَالًا لَتَرَكَ النَّاسُ التِّجَارَاتِ وَ مَا يَحْتَاجُونَ إِلَيْهِ فَحَرَّمَ اللَّهُ الرِّبَا لِيَفِرَّ النَّاسُ مِنَ الْحَرَامِ إِلَى الْحَلَالِ وَ إِلَى التِّجَارَاتِ وَ إِلَى الْبَيْعِ وَ الشِّرَاءِ فَيَبْقَى ذَلِكَ بَيْنَهُمْ فِي الْقَرْضِ.

English translationBab Ul Qaim Publications

Hadith.4937 - Hisham ibn al-Hakam asked Abu Abdillah (as) about the reason for the prohibition of usury. Imam (as) said: "If usury had been permissible, people would have abandoned trade and the things they need. Therefore, Allah (swt) forbade usury so that people would turn away from what is unlawful toward what is lawful, engaging in trade, buying, and selling, allowing these practices to continue among them through lending."

Translation: Bab Ul Qaim Publications·Thaqalayn link·The Arabic above is the original.

Citation

من لا يحضره الفقيه Volume 3, Page 567

View original source
من لا يحضره الفقيه · Hadith 4937 — Usul16