ARead English translationHide English translationBab Ul Qaim Publications — attributed by Thaqalayn⌄
Hadith.3279 - It is narrated from Sabbah Al-Muzani, who raised it (in chain of narration): Two men came to Commander of the Faithful (as). One of them said: "O Commander of the Faithful, this man and I went out together. I brought three loaves of bread, and he brought five loaves of bread. We had lunch together, and a man passed by us, so we invited him to join us for lunch. He came and ate with us. When we finished, he gifted us eight dirhams and left. I said to this man: 'Divide the dirhams with me.' He said: 'I will not do so except based on the proportion of the shares of the bread.' Commander of the Faithful (as) said: 'Go and reconcile between yourselves.' The man replied: 'O Commander of the Faithful, he refuses to give me more than three dirhams while he takes five dirhams. Judge between us.' Commander of the Faithful (as) said to him: 'O servant of Allah (swt), do you know that three loaves of bread equal nine thirds?' He said: 'Yes.' Imam (as) continued: 'And do you know that five loaves of bread equal fifteen thirds?' He said: 'Yes.' Imam (as) said: 'You ate from your nine-thirds eight-thirds, leaving you one-third. And this man ate from his fifteen-thirds eight-thirds, leaving him seven-thirds. The guest ate seven-thirds from this man's bread and one-third from your bread. Thus, each of you consumed eight-thirds. This man is entitled to seven dirhams, one dirham for each remaining third of bread he contributed, and you are entitled to one dirham for the one-third you contributed. So, take one dirham, and give this man seven dirhams.'"
[2]صباح بن يحيى المزنى ثقة، و روى الخبر الكليني بلفظ آخر عن محمّد بن يحيى عن أحمد بن محمّد، و عن عليّ بن إبراهيم، عن أبيه جميعا، عن ابن محبوب، عن عبد الرحمن ابن الحجاج.ص 37
ARead English translationHide English translationBab Ul Qaim Publications — attributed by Thaqalayn⌄
Hadith.3280 - It is narrated from Abdullah ibn Abi Ya'fur, who said: I asked Abu Abdullah (as): "By what means is the righteousness ('Adalah) of a man among the Muslims recognized, so that his testimony may be accepted for or against them?" Imam (as) replied: "It is recognized by his modesty and chastity, by his restraint over his stomach, private parts, hands, and tongue, and by his avoidance of major sins for which Allah (swt), the Mighty and Majestic, has threatened punishment in Hell. These sins include: drinking alcohol, fornication, usury, disobedience to parents, fleeing from battle, and other similar acts. The sign of all this is that he covers his faults and defects, making it impermissible for Muslims to investigate or expose his errors and shortcomings. It becomes obligatory upon them to testify to his righteousness and exhibit his piety among people. Additionally, he must be diligent in observing the five daily prayers, maintaining their times, and attending congregational prayers with the Muslims. He should not miss the congregation at the mosque except for a valid excuse. If he remains steadfast in attending his place of prayer for the five daily prayers, and when asked about him in his community or neighborhood, people say: 'We have seen nothing but good from him. He is regular in prayers, punctual in observing their times, and consistently present at his place of prayer,' then this confirms his testimony and establishes his righteousness among Muslims. This is because prayer serves as a covering and an expiation for sins. It is not possible to testify to a man's observance of prayer unless he attends his place of worship and maintains congregation with the Muslims. Indeed, congregation and assembly for prayer were instituted so that those who pray may be distinguished from those who do not, and those who guard the times of prayer from those who neglect them. Without this, no one could testify to another's piety. Whoever does not pray has no righteousness among the Muslims. The Messenger of Allah (swt) (peace be upon him and his family) even intended to burn the houses of those who abandoned congregational prayer, despite some of them praying at home. This was not accepted from them. How then can the testimony or righteousness of someone be accepted when Allah (swt), the Mighty and Majestic, and His Messenger (peace be upon him and his family) had judged that such a person deserves to be burned in his house during the daytime? The Messenger of Allah (swt) (peace be upon him and his family) used to say: 'There is no prayer for the one who does not pray in the mosque with the Muslims, except due to a valid excuse.'"
[1]روى الخبر الشيخ في التهذيب ج 2 ص 74 في الصحيح عن محمّد بن أحمد بن يحيى، عن محمّد بن موسى، عن الحسن بن عليّ، عن أبيه، عن عليّ بن عقبة، عن موسى بن أكيل النميرى عن ابن أبي يعفور و المراد بالحسن بن عليّ بن فضال الذي يروى عن أبيه، عن عليّ بن عقبة كثيرا.ص 38
[2]أي يكون مستور العيوب سواء لم يكن له عيب أم كان و لم يعلم لانا مكلفون بالظاهر( م ت).ص 38
[3]إلى هنا معنى أصل العدالة و الباقي بيان أمور تدلّ على وجودها في صاحبها.ص 38
[4]في التهذيبين« باحضار جماعة المسلمين» بدون لفظة« من» و لعله الاصوب.ص 38
[5]من هنا الى قوله« عدالته بين المسلمين» ليس في التهذيبين.ص 38
[1]من هنا الى قوله« ممن يضيع» ليس في التهذيبين و بعده فيهما هكذا« و لو لا ذلك لم يكن لاحد أن يشهد على أحد بالصلاح لان من لم يصل فلا صلاح له بين المسلمين، لان الحكم جرى فيه من اللّه و من رسوله صلّى اللّه عليه و آله بالحرق في جوف بيته و قال رسول اللّه صلّى اللّه عليه و آله:« لا صلاة لمن لا يصلّى في المسجد مع المسلمين الا من علّة» و قال رسول اللّه صلّى اللّه عليه و آله:« لا غيبة الا لمن صلّى في جوف بيته و رغب عن جماعتنا، و من رغب عن جماعة المسلمين وجبت غيبته و سقطت بينهم عدالته و وجب هجرانه» و إذا رفع الى امام المسلمين أنذره و حذره، فان حضر جماعة المسلمين و الا أحرق عليه بيته، و من لزم جماعتهم حرمت عليهم غيبته و ثبتت عدالته بينهم».ص 39
[2]قال الأستاذ- مدّ ظلّه-: زعم بعض الفقهاء أن الاطلاع على العدالة غير ممكن و هو خطأ فان العدالة كسائر الصفات النفسانية كالبخل و الجود و الحسد و العلم و الجهل و الذوق، يدل عليها بالاعمال و الظواهر و ذكر في هذا الحديث نبذا من أمثلة ما يدلّ على العدالة و ليست توقيفيّة لان الحكم الشرعى على نفس العدالة لا على ما يدلّ عليه فإذا علمت بأى دليل كفى، و لو كلفنا اللّه تعالى بالعلم بالعدالة لم يكن تكليفا بما لا يطاق لان العلم بها ممكن و اكتفى بعض علمائنا بحصول الظنّ بها زعما منه أن تحصيل العلم بها غير ممكن، و نقول هو ممكن بل ميسور و سهل الا في المبتلين بالوسواس الذين يصعب العلم لهم في جميع الأشياء و منها العدالة، و تدلّ الروايات على أن الأصل العدالة فلا يحتاج الى تكلّف الدليل عليه.ص 39
الهوامش · 5 footnotes⌄
[١]روى الخبر الشيخ في التهذيب ج 2 ص 74 في الصحيح عن محمّد بن أحمد بن يحيى، عن محمّد بن موسى، عن الحسن بن عليّ، عن أبيه، عن عليّ بن عقبة، عن موسى بن أكيل النميرى عن ابن أبي يعفور و المراد بالحسن بن عليّ بن فضال الذي يروى عن أبيه، عن عليّ بن عقبة كثيرا.
[٢]أي يكون مستور العيوب سواء لم يكن له عيب أم كان و لم يعلم لانا مكلفون بالظاهر( م ت).
[٣]إلى هنا معنى أصل العدالة و الباقي بيان أمور تدلّ على وجودها في صاحبها.
[٤]في التهذيبين« باحضار جماعة المسلمين» بدون لفظة« من» و لعله الاصوب.
[٥]من هنا الى قوله« عدالته بين المسلمين» ليس في التهذيبين.