Usul16

Hadith record

faqih-3927

من لا يحضره الفقيه

Book of Livelihood/Chapter on the Liability of One Who Carried Something and Claimed Its Loss#14

No. ٣٩٣٣chapter #14vol. 3 · page 258
faqih-3927
رُوِيَ عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عَلِيِّ بْنِ مَحْبُوبٍ قَالَ
Show clickable narrator chain

كَتَبَ رَجُلٌ إِلَى الْفَقِيهِ ع‌ فِي رَجُلٍ دَفَعَ ثَوْباً إِلَى الْقَصَّارِ لِيُقَصِّرَهُ فَدَفَعَهُ الْقَصَّارُ إِلَى قَصَّارٍ غَيْرِهِ لِيُقَصِّرَهُ فَضَاعَ الثَّوْبُ هَلْ يَجِبُ عَلَى الْقَصَّارِ أَنْ يَرُدَّ مَا دَفَعَهُ إِلَى غَيْرِهِ إِنْ كَانَ الْقَصَّارُ مَأْمُوناً فَوَقَّعَ ع هُوَ ضَامِنٌ لَهُ إِلَّا أَنْ يَكُونَ ثِقَةً مَأْمُوناً إِنْ شَاءَ اللَّهُ.

English translationBab Ul Qaim Publications

Hadith.3933 - It is narrated from Muhammad bin Ali bin Mahbub, who said: A man wrote to the 'Jurist' (Imam Hasan ibn Ali Al-Askari (as)) asking about a case where a person gave a garment to a launderer to clean, and the launderer then handed it over to another launderer to clean, but the garment was lost. Should the first launderer be required to compensate for what he entrusted to another? Imam (as) wrote in reply: "He is liable for it unless the second launderer is trustworthy and reliable, God willing."

Translation: Bab Ul Qaim Publications·Thaqalayn link·The Arabic above is the original.

الهوامش1

[2]لعل المراد القصار الثاني يعنى ان كان القصار الثاني ثقة مأمونا لم يفرط الأول فلم يكن ضامنا.ص 258

Citation

من لا يحضره الفقيه Volume 3, Page 258

View original source