رُوِيَ عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عَلِيِّ بْنِ مَحْبُوبٍ قَالَ
Show clickable narrator chain
كَتَبَ رَجُلٌ إِلَى الْفَقِيهِ ع فِي رَجُلٍ دَفَعَ ثَوْباً إِلَى الْقَصَّارِ لِيُقَصِّرَهُ فَدَفَعَهُ الْقَصَّارُ إِلَى قَصَّارٍ غَيْرِهِ لِيُقَصِّرَهُ فَضَاعَ الثَّوْبُ هَلْ يَجِبُ عَلَى الْقَصَّارِ أَنْ يَرُدَّ مَا دَفَعَهُ إِلَى غَيْرِهِ إِنْ كَانَ الْقَصَّارُ مَأْمُوناً فَوَقَّعَ ع هُوَ ضَامِنٌ لَهُ إِلَّا أَنْ يَكُونَ ثِقَةً مَأْمُوناً إِنْ شَاءَ اللَّهُ.
Read English translationHide English translationBab Ul Qaim Publications — attributed by Thaqalayn
Hadith.3933 - It is narrated from Muhammad bin Ali bin Mahbub, who said: A man wrote to the 'Jurist' (Imam Hasan ibn Ali Al-Askari (as)) asking about a case where a person gave a garment to a launderer to clean, and the launderer then handed it over to another launderer to clean, but the garment was lost. Should the first launderer be required to compensate for what he entrusted to another? Imam (as) wrote in reply: "He is liable for it unless the second launderer is trustworthy and reliable, God willing."
Translation: Bab Ul Qaim Publications — attributed by Thaqalayn·The Arabic above is the original.
الهوامش · 1⌄
[2]لعل المراد القصار الثاني يعنى ان كان القصار الثاني ثقة مأمونا لم يفرط الأول فلم يكن ضامنا.ص 258