رَوَى الْحَسَنُ بْنُ مَحْبُوبٍ عَنْ جَمِيلِ بْنِ صَالِحٍ عَنْ أَبِي عُبَيْدَةَ الْحَذَّاءِ قَالَ:
Show clickable narrator chain
سُئِلَ أَبُو جَعْفَرٍ ع عَنْ خَصِيٍّ تَزَوَّجَ امْرَأَةً وَ هِيَ تَعْلَمُ أَنَّهُ خَصِيٌّ قَالَ جَائِزٌ قِيلَ لَهُ إِنَّهُ مَكَثَ مَعَهَا مَا شَاءَ اللَّهُ ثُمَّ طَلَّقَهَا هَلْ عَلَيْهَا عِدَّةٌ قَالَ نَعَمْ أَ لَيْسَ قَدْ لَذَّ مِنْهَا وَ لَذَّتْ مِنْهُ قِيلَ لَهُ فَهَلْ كَانَ عَلَيْهَا فِيمَا يَكُونُ مِنْهَا وَ مِنْهُ غُسْلٌ قَالَ إِنْ كَانَ إِذَا كَانَ ذَلِكَ مِنْهُ أَمْنَتْ فَإِنَّ عَلَيْهَا غُسْلًا قِيلَ لَهُ فَلَهُ أَنْ يَرْجِعَ بِشَيْءٍ مِنَ الصَّدَاقِ إِذَا طَلَّقَهَا قَالَ لَا.
Read English translationHide English translationBab Ul Qaim Publications — attributed by Thaqalayn
Hadith.4472 - Al-Hasan ibn Mahbub narrated from Jamil ibn Salih from Abu Ubaydah al-Hadhdha' that Abu Jafar Imam Muhammad ibn Ali Al-Baqir (as) was asked about a eunuch who married a woman, and she was aware that he was a eunuch. Imam (as) said: "It is permissible." It was then asked: "If he remained with her as long as Allah (swt) willed and then divorced her, is she required to observe a waiting period (iddah)?" Imam (as) replied: "Yes, did he not experience pleasure with her, and did she not experience pleasure with him?" Imam (as) was further asked: "Is she required to perform ritual purification (ghusl) due to their intimacy?" Ima (as) replied: "If she experiences sexual discharge during their intimacy, then she is required to perform ghusl." Finally, Imam (as) was asked: "Does he have the right to reclaim any part of the dowry (mahr) if he divorces her?" Imam (as) said: "No."
Translation: Bab Ul Qaim Publications — attributed by Thaqalayn·The Arabic above is the original.
الهوامش · 1⌄
[1]قال في المسالك: ذهب جماعة من المتقدمين الى أن الخلوة يوجب المهر ظاهرا حيث لا يثبت شرعا عدم الدخول و أمّا باطنا فلا يستقر المهر جميعه الا بالدخول، و أطلق بعضهم كالصدوق وجوبه بمجرد الخلوة و أضاف ابن الجنيد الى الجماع انزال الماء بغير ايلاج و لمس العورة و النظر إليها و القبلة متلذذا.ص 424