Usul16
الکافی- ط الاسلامیة

الكافي- ط الاسلامية

Printed-page view →

بَابُ حَدِّ الْمَرْأَةِ الَّتِي لَهَا زَوْجٌ فَتَزَوَّجُ أَوْ تَتَزَوَّجُ وَ هِيَ فِي عِدَّتِهَا وَ الرَّجُلِ الَّذِي يَتَزَوَّجُ ذَاتَ زَوْجٍ‌

alkafi-13674

مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَحْيَى عَنْ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عِيسَى عَنِ ابْنِ مَحْبُوبٍ عَنْ جَمِيلِ بْنِ صَالِحٍ عَنْ أَبِي عُبَيْدَةَ عَنْ أَبِي عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ع قَالَ:

Show clickable narrator chain

سَأَلْتُهُ عَنِ امْرَأَةٍ تَزَوَّجَتْ رَجُلًا وَ لَهَا زَوْجٌ قَالَ فَقَالَ إِنْ كَانَ زَوْجُهَا الْأَوَّلُ مُقِيماً مَعَهَا فِي الْمِصْرِ الَّذِي هِيَ فِيهِ تَصِلُ إِلَيْهِ وَ يَصِلُ إِلَيْهَا فَإِنَّ عَلَيْهَا مَا عَلَى الزَّانِي الْمُحْصَنِ الرَّجْمَ قَالَ وَ إِنْ كَانَ زَوْجُهَا الْأَوَّلُ غَائِباً عَنْهَا أَوْ كَانَ مُقِيماً مَعَهَا فِي الْمِصْرِ لَا يَصِلُ إِلَيْهَا وَ لَا تَصِلُ إِلَيْهِ فَإِنَّ عَلَيْهَا مَا عَلَى الزَّانِيَةِ غَيْرِ الْمُحْصَنَةِ وَ لَا لِعَانَ بَيْنَهُمَا وَ لَا تَفْرِيقَ قُلْتُ مَنْ يَرْجُمُهُمَا أَوْ يَضْرِبُهُمَا الْحَدَّ وَ زَوْجُهَا لَا يُقَدِّمُهَا إِلَى الْإِمَامِ وَ لَا يُرِيدُ ذَلِكَ مِنْهَا فَقَالَ إِنَّ الْحَدَّ لَا يَزَالُ لِلَّهِ فِي بَدَنِهَا حَتَّى يَقُومَ بِهِ مَنْ قَامَ أَوْ تَلْقَى اللَّهَ وَ هُوَ عَلَيْهَا غَضْبَانُ قُلْتُ فَإِنْ كَانَتْ جَاهِلَةً بِمَا صَنَعَتْ قَالَ فَقَالَ أَ لَيْسَ هِيَ فِي دَارِ الْهِجْرَةِ قُلْتُ بَلَى قَالَ فَمَا مِنِ امْرَأَةٍ الْيَوْمَ مِنْ نِسَاءِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ إِلَّا وَ هِيَ تَعْلَمُ أَنَّ الْمَرْأَةَ الْمُسْلِمَةَ لَا يَحِلُّ لَهَا أَنْ تَتَزَوَّجَ زَوْجَيْنِ قَالَ وَ لَوْ أَنَّ الْمَرْأَةَ إِذَا فَجَرَتْ قَالَتْ لَمْ أَدْرِ أَوْ جَهِلْتُ أَنَّ الَّذِي فَعَلْتُ حَرَامٌ وَ لَمْ يُقَمْ عَلَيْهَا الْحَدُّ إِذاً لَتَعَطَّلَتِ الْحُدُودُ.

Read English translationHubeAli — attributed by Thaqalayn

Muhammad Bin Yahya, from Ahmad Bin Muhammad Bin Isa, from Ibn Mahboub, from Jameel Bin Salih, from Abu Ubeyda, (The narrator) says, ‘I asked Abu Abdullah asws about a woman who married a man, (although) for her was a husband’. So he asws said: ‘If her first husband was living with her in the city which she was in, she could go to him and he could go to her, so upon her would be what is upon the married adulterer, the stoning. And if it was that her first husband was absent from her, or was staying with her in the city, not coming to her and she could not go to him, so upon her would be what is upon an unmarried adulteress, and there is no Li’an (cursing) between the two of them, nor any separation (to be brought about)’. I said, ‘Who would be stoning the two of them, or whipping the two of them with the Penalty ( Hadd ), and her husband did not come to the Imam asws , nor does he intend that from it’. So he asws said ‘The Penalty ( Hadd ) would not cease to be upon her body, for the Sake of Allah azwj , until it is established by the one who establishes it, and or she meets Allah azwj and He azwj would be Angry upon her’. I said, ‘So if she was ignorant with what she had done?’ So he asws said: ‘Is she not in the era of the emigration (Hijra)?’ I said, ‘Yes’. He asws said: ‘So there is none from a woman today from the Muslim women except that she knows that it is not Permissible for the Muslim woman to have two husbands for her. And if the woman, when she is immoral, say that ‘I did not know, or I was ignorant’, of that which she has done, and the Penalty ( Hadd ) is not established upon her, then the Penalties would be disrupted’.

Translation: HubeAli — attributed by Thaqalayn·The Arabic above is the original.

alkafi-13675

عِدَّةٌ مِنْ أَصْحَابِنَا عَنْ سَهْلِ بْنِ زِيَادٍ وَ عَلِيُّ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ عَنْ أَبِيهِ جَمِيعاً عَنِ ابْنِ مَحْبُوبٍ عَنْ أَبِي أَيُّوبَ عَنْ يَزِيدَ الْكُنَاسِيِّ قَالَ:

Show clickable narrator chain

سَأَلْتُ أَبَا جَعْفَرٍ ع عَنِ امْرَأَةٍ تَزَوَّجَتْ فِي عِدَّتِهَا قَالَ إِنْ كَانَتْ تَزَوَّجَتْ فِي عِدَّةِ طَلَاقٍ لِزَوْجِهَا عَلَيْهَا الرَّجْعَةُ فَإِنَّ عَلَيْهَا الرَّجْمَ وَ إِنْ كَانَتْ تَزَوَّجَتْ فِي عِدَّةٍ لَيْسَ لِزَوْجِهَا عَلَيْهَا الرَّجْعَةُ فَإِنَّ عَلَيْهَا حَدَّ الزَّانِي غَيْرِ الْمُحْصَنِ وَ إِنْ كَانَتْ تَزَوَّجَتْ فِي عِدَّةٍ مِنْ بَعْدِ مَوْتِ زَوْجِهَا مِنْ قَبْلِ انْقِضَاءِ الْأَرْبَعَةِ أَشْهُرٍ وَ الْعَشَرَةِ أَيَّامٍ فَلَا رَجْمَ عَلَيْهَا وَ عَلَيْهَا ضَرْبُ مِائَةِ جَلْدَةٍ قُلْتُ أَ رَأَيْتَ إِنْ كَانَ ذَلِكَ مِنْهَا بِجَهَالَةٍ قَالَ فَقَالَ مَا مِنِ امْرَأَةٍ الْيَوْمَ مِنْ نِسَاءِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ إِلَّا وَ هِيَ تَعْلَمُ أَنَّ عَلَيْهَا عِدَّةً فِي طَلَاقٍ أَوْ مَوْتٍ وَ لَقَدْ كُنَّ نِسَاءُ الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ يَعْرِفْنَ ذَلِكَ قُلْتُ فَإِنْ كَانَتْ تَعْلَمُ أَنَّ عَلَيْهَا عِدَّةً وَ لَا تَدْرِي كَمْ هِيَ قَالَ فَقَالَ إِذَا عَلِمَتْ أَنَّ عَلَيْهَا الْعِدَّةَ لَزِمَتْهَا الْحُجَّةُ فَتَسْأَلُ حَتَّى تَعْلَمَ.

Read English translationHubeAli — attributed by Thaqalayn

A number of our companions, from Sahl Bin Ziyad and Ali Bin Ibrahim, from his father, altogether from Ibn Mahboub, from Abu Ayoub, from Yazeed Al Kunasy who said, ‘I asked Abu Ja’far asws about a woman who married whilst being in her waiting period. He asws said: ‘If she has married during a waiting period of a divorce, and for her husband is the (right of) return, so upon her would be the stoning; and if she has married during a waiting period, there not being the (right of) return for husband, so upon her would be the Penalty ( Hadd ) of the unmarried adulterer; and if she has married during her waiting period from after the death of her husband, before the expiry of four months and ten days, so there would not be stoning upon her, and upon her would be one hundred lashes’. I said, ‘What is your asws view, if that was from her due to ignorance’. So he asws said: ‘There is none from a woman today, from the Muslim women, except that she knows that upon her is a waiting period regarding a divorce, or death (of her husband), and the women during the pre-Islamic period used to know that’. I said, ‘So if she knew that upon her is a waiting period, and she did not know how much it was?’ So he asws said: ‘When she knew that upon her is the waiting period, the proof was necessitated upon her, so she should have asked until she had known’.

Translation: HubeAli — attributed by Thaqalayn·The Arabic above is the original.

alkafi-13676

عَلِيُّ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ عَنْ أَبِيهِ عَنْ إِسْمَاعِيلَ بْنِ مَرَّارٍ عَنْ يُونُسَ عَنْ أَبِي بَصِيرٍ عَنْ أَبِي عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ع قَالَ:

Show clickable narrator chain

سَأَلْتُهُ عَنِ امْرَأَةٍ تَزَوَّجَهَا رَجُلٌ فَوَجَدَ لَهَا زَوْجاً قَالَ عَلَيْهِ الْجَلْدُ وَ عَلَيْهَا الرَّجْمُ لِأَنَّهُ قَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بِغَيْرِ عِلْمٍ وَ تَقَدَّمَتْ هِيَ بِعِلْمٍ وَ كَفَّارَتُهُ إِنْ لَمْ يُتَقَدَّمْ إِلَى الْإِمَامِ أَنْ يَتَصَدَّقَ بِخَمْسَةِ أَصْوُعِ دَقِيقٍ.

Read English translationHubeAli — attributed by Thaqalayn

Ali Bin Ibrahim, from his father, from Ismail Bin Marrar, from Yunus, from Abu Baseer, (The narrator) says, ‘I asked Abu Abdullah asws about a woman whom a man married and he found there being a husband for her’. He asws said: ‘Upon him would be the whipping and upon her is the stoning, because he has proceeded without knowledge, and she proceeded with knowledge, and his ‘kufara’ expiation, if he did not proceed to the Imam asws , is that he should give in charity with five Sa’a (a unit of measurement being four handfuls each) of flour’.

Translation: HubeAli — attributed by Thaqalayn·The Arabic above is the original.

الهوامش · 1

[1]حمل على التعزير لتقصيره في التفتيش أو على ما إذا ظنّ أن لها زوجا و احتمل الشيخ أن يكون متهما في دعوى التزويج.( آت)ص 193

alkafi-13677

مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَحْيَى عَنْ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ عَنِ ابْنِ مَحْبُوبٍ عَنْ يُونُسَ بْنِ يَعْقُوبَ عَنْ أَبِي بَصِيرٍ عَنْ أَبِي جَعْفَرٍ ع قَالَ:

Show clickable narrator chain

سُئِلَ عَنِ امْرَأَةٍ كَانَ لَهَا زَوْجٌ غَائِبٌ عَنْهَا فَتَزَوَّجَتْ زَوْجاً آخَرَ قَالَ إِنْ رُفِعَتْ إِلَى الْإِمَامِ ثُمَّ شَهِدَ عَلَيْهَا شُهُودٌ أَنَّ لَهَا زَوْجاً غَائِباً وَ أَنَّ مَادَّتَهُ‌ وَ خَبَرَهُ يَأْتِيهَا مِنْهُ وَ أَنَّهَا تَزَوَّجَتْ زَوْجاً آخَرَ كَانَ عَلَى الْإِمَامِ أَنْ يَحُدَّهَا وَ يُفَرِّقَ بَيْنَهَا وَ بَيْنَ الَّذِي تَزَوَّجَهَا قُلْتُ فَالْمَهْرُ الَّذِي أَخَذَتْ مِنْهُ كَيْفَ يُصْنَعُ بِهِ قَالَ إِنْ أَصَابَ مِنْهُ شَيْئاً فَلْيَأْخُذْهُ وَ إِنْ لَمْ يُصِبْ مِنْهُ شَيْئاً فَإِنَّ كُلَّ مَا أَخَذَتْ مِنْهُ حَرَامٌ عَلَيْهَا مِثْلُ أَجْرِ الْفَاجِرَةِ.

Read English translationHubeAli — attributed by Thaqalayn

Muhammad Bin Yahya, from Ahmad Bin Muhammad, from Ibn Mahboub, from Yunus Bin Yaqoub, from Abu Baseer, (It has been narrated) from Abu Ja’far asws , when ‘He asws was asked about a woman who had a husband, but he was absent from her, so she married another husband’. He asws said: ‘If it (the matter) is raised to the Imam asws , then four witnesses testify against her that there was a husband for her, absent, and that his materials and his news were coming to her, and that she has married another husband, it would be upon the Imam asws that he asws established the Penalty ( Hadd ) on her, and effected separation between her and the one she had married’. I said, ‘So the dower which she has taken from him, how should it be dealt with?’ He asws said: ‘If he can attain anything from it, so let him take it, and if he cannot attain anything from it, so everything what she has taken from it is Prohibited upon her, similar to the payment of the Immoral woman (prostitute)’.

Translation: HubeAli — attributed by Thaqalayn·The Arabic above is the original.

الهوامش · 1

[2]أي نفقته و انما ذكر هذا لرفع الشبهة الدارئة للحد، و قال في المسالك: مع علمها لا شي‌ء لها لأنّها بغى و ان كان الزوج جاهلا انتهى.ص 193

alkafi-13678

عَلِيُّ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ عَنْ أَبِيهِ عَنِ ابْنِ أَبِي عُمَيْرٍ عَنْ حَمَّادٍ عَنِ الْحَلَبِيِّ عَنْ‌ أَبِي عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ع

Show clickable narrator chain

‌ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً ع ضَرَبَ رَجُلًا تَزَوَّجَ امْرَأَةً فِي نِفَاسِهَا قَبْلَ أَنْ تَطْهُرَ الْحَدَّ[1]

Read English translationHubeAli — attributed by Thaqalayn

Ali Bin Ibrahim, from his father, from Ibn Abu Umeyr, from Hammad, from Al Halby, (It has been narrated) from Abu Abdullah asws that Ali asws struck a man with the Penalty ( Hadd ), who married a woman during her menses, before she had purified’.

Translation: HubeAli — attributed by Thaqalayn·The Arabic above is the original.